1
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):
February 16, 2001 (February 13, 2001)
Corrections Corporation of America
----------------------------------
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland 0-25245 62-1763875
-------- ------- ----------
(State or other jurisdiction (Commission File Number) (I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation) Identification No.)
10 Burton Hills Boulevard, Nashville, Tennessee 37215
-----------------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (615) 263-3000
Not Applicable
--------------
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)
2
ITEM 5. OTHER EVENTS.
FINAL COURT APPROVALS OF REVISED TERMS OF STOCKHOLDER LITIGATION SETTLEMENT.
On February 13, 2001, Corrections Corporation of America, a Maryland
corporation formerly known as Prison Realty Trust, Inc. (the "Company"),
received final court approvals of the revised terms of the definitive agreements
with respect to the settlement of a series of class action and derivative
lawsuits brought against the Company by current and former stockholders of the
Company and its predecessors. Pursuant to the revised terms of the settlements,
the Company will issue to the plaintiffs:
- an aggregate of 46,900,000 shares of the Company's common
stock; and
- a subordinated promissory note in the aggregate principal
amount of $29.0 million.
Other than with respect to the issuance of the common stock and the
promissory note by the Company, the original settlement agreements have not been
altered by the terms of the revised settlement agreements, including the
requirement that the Company pay approximately $47.5 million in cash insurance
proceeds to the plaintiffs. Please see the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K
as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") on
October 30, 2000 for a complete description of the terms of the previously
announced settlement agreements.
With respect to the Company's issuance of the common stock and the
promissory note, the terms of the definitive settlement agreements receiving
final court approvals replace all previously existing obligations of the
Company, under the provisions of the original settlement agreements and a
Memorandum of Understanding, dated as of December 14, 2000, between the parties
(the "Memorandum of Understanding"), to issue shares of its common stock and/or
other indebtedness to the plaintiffs in the litigation. Please see the Company's
Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the Commission on December 18, 2000 for
a complete description of the terms of the Memorandum of Understanding.
Under the terms of the definitive settlement agreements, the
subordinated promissory note to be issued by the Company will be due January 2,
2009, and will accrue interest at a rate of 8.0% per annum. All principal and
interest due under the note will be payable in one lump sum at maturity;
provided, however, that should the average trading price of the Company's common
stock meet or exceed a "termination price" equal to $1.63 per share for 15
consecutive trading days at any time prior to the maturity date of the note, all
amounts outstanding under the promissory note will be deemed fully satisfied
without further action by the Company.
To the extent the highest average trading price of the common stock
does not reach the designated "termination price" during such period, the
aggregate amount to be paid under the note will be reduced by the amount (the
"Appreciation Amount") that the shares of stock issued to the plaintiffs
appreciate in value pursuant to a calculation to be made at the time of the
maturity of the note. The Appreciation Amount shall be determined by
multiplying: (i) 46,900,000 (i.e., the number of shares issued in the definitive
settlement), as adjusted for any reclassification or division of the Company's
common stock; by (ii) the excess of (A) the average per share trading price of
the Company's common stock for the 50 consecutive trading days prior to the
maturity date of the note over (B) $0.49, as adjusted for any reclassification
or division of the Company's common stock.
1
3
Further details on the final settlement can also be found in the
Supplemental Notice of Pendency of Class Actions, Proposed Settlement Thereof,
Settlement Hearing and Right to Share in Settlement Fund, which is available
from the Settlement Administrator. As part of the revised settlement, the
deadline for claimants who have not already done so to submit a Proof of Claim
and Release Form to the Settlement Administrator has been extended to March 12,
2001.
The complete text of the final judgments and orders of dismissal issued
by the various courts approving the final settlement are included as Exhibits
hereto and are incorporated herein in their entirety. The press release issued
by the Company on February 13, 2001 with respect to the final court approvals is
filed as an Exhibit hereto and is incorporated herein in its entirety.
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.
This Current Report on Form 8-K contains forward-looking statements
within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Actual results
could differ materially from those as set forth in the forward-looking
statements.
ITEM 7(c). EXHIBITS.
The following exhibits are filed as part of this Current Report:
Exhibit
Number Description of Exhibits
- ------- -----------------------
99.1 Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice, Civil Action
No. 3:99-0458, issued by the United States District Court for the
Middle District of Tennessee.
99.2 Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice, Civil Action
No. 98-239-III, issued by the Chancery Court of Davidson County for
the Twentieth Judicial District.
99.3 Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice, Civil Action
No. 99-1719-III, issued by the Chancery Court of Davidson County for
the Twentieth Judicial District.
99.4 Company press release, dated February 13, 2001, announcing final
court approvals of the definitive settlement agreements.
2
4
'
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, the undersigned Registrant has duly caused this Current Report on Form
8-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
Date: February 16, 2001 CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
By: /s/ John D. Ferguson
--------------------------------------
Its: Chief Executive Officer and President
3
5
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit
Number Description of Exhibits
- ------- -----------------------
99.1 Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice, Civil Action
No. 3:99-0458, issued by the United States District Court for the
Middle District of Tennessee.
99.2 Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice, Civil Action
No. 98-239-III, issued by the Chancery Court of Davidson County for
the Twentieth Judicial District.
99.3 Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice, Civil Action
No. 99-1719-III, issued by the Chancery Court of Davidson County
for the Twentieth Judicial District.
99.4 Company press release, dated February 13, 2001, announcing final
court approvals of the definitive settlement agreements.
4
1
EXHIBIT 99.1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
In re PRISON REALTY SECURITIES ) Civil Action No. 3:99-0458
LITIGATION )
____________________________________) CLASS ACTION
------------
)
This Document Relates To All Actions) Judge Campbell/Griffin
Consolidated with Cartwright )
- ------------------------------------)
)
In re OLD CCA SECURITIES ) Civil Action No. 3:99-0452
LITIGATION )
____________________________________) CLASS ACTION
------------
)
This Document Relates To All Actions) Judge Campbell/Griffin
Consolidated with Charles )
- ------------------------------------)
)
JOHN NEIGER, On Behalf of Himself ) Civil Action No. 3:99-1205
And All Others Similarly Situated, )
) CLASS ACTION
------------
Plaintiff, )
) FINAL JUDGMENT
vs. ) AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH
) PREJUDICE
DOCTOR CRANTS, ROBERT CRANTS, )
AND PRISON REALTY TRUST, INC., ) DATE: February 9, 2001
) TIME: 1:00 p.m.
Defendants. ) COURTROOM: The Honorable
____________________________________) Todd Campbell
2
On this 9th day of February, 2001, a hearing having been held before
this Court pursuant to the Orders of this Court, dated October 13, 2000 and
January 8, 2001, on the application of the parties for approval of the
settlement set forth in the Stipulation of Settlement, dated as of October 11,
2000 (the "Stipulation"), and the Amended Stipulation of Settlement, dated as of
January 7, 2001 (the "Amended Stipulation"). Due and adequate notice having been
given to the Settlement Classes as required in said orders and the Court having
considered all papers filed and proceedings had herein and otherwise being fully
informed in the premises and good cause appearing therefore,
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:
1. This Judgment incorporates by reference the definitions in the
Stipulation and the Amended Stipulation and all terms used therein shall have
the same meanings as set forth in the Stipulation and the Amended Stipulation.
2. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the Actions,
the plaintiffs, and other members of the Settlement Classes, and the Defendants.
3. The Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Actions,
Proposed Settlement Thereof, Settlement Hearing and Right to Share in Settlement
Fund and the Supplemental Notice of Pendency of Class Actions, Proposed
Settlement Thereof, Settlement Hearing and Right to Share in Settlement Fund
given to the Settlement Classes were the best notice practicable under the
circumstances, including the individual notice to all members of the Settlement
Classes who could be identified through reasonable effort, to all persons within
the definition of the Settlement Classes and fully met the requirements of Rule
23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, due process, the United States
Constitution, and any other applicable law.
-1-
3
4. The settlement of the Actions, as set forth in the Stipulation and
the Amended Stipulation, is approved as fair and reasonable to the Settlement
Classes and to each of the Settling Parties, and the Stipulation, Amended
Stipulation and settlement are hereby finally approved in all respects, and the
Settling Parties are directed to perform their terms.
5. Except as to any individual claim of those persons (identified in
Exhibit 1 annexed hereto) who have validly and timely requested exclusion from
the Settlement Classes, the Actions and all claims contained therein, as well as
all of the Released Claims (including Unknown Claims), are dismissed with
prejudice as to the Representative Plaintiffs and the other members of the
Settlement Classes, and as against the Released Persons. The parties are to bear
their own costs, except as otherwise provided in the Stipulation and the Amended
Stipulation.
6. Pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this
Court has certified the following Settlement Classes: all persons (other than
those persons who timely and validly request exclusion from their respective
class) who (i) exchanged the common stock or 8.0% Series A cumulative preferred
stock of Old PZN for New PZN common stock or 8% Series A Cumulative Preferred
Stock (the "Preferred Stock") in the Merger or who purchased the common stock of
New PZN or the Preferred Stock between January 1, 1999 and May 17, 1999,
inclusive; (ii) exchanged shares of Corrections Corporation of America ("Old
CCA") common stock for shares of New PZN common stock in the Merger; or (iii)
purchased New PZN common stock or the Preferred Stock between May 18, 1999
through December 27, 1999, inclusive. Excluded from the Settlement Classes are
Defendants and any entity that nominated a Defendant to serve on the Board of
Directors of Prison Realty or its predecessors, members of the immediate family
of the Defendants, any entity
-2-
4
in which an excluded person has or had a controlling interest, present or former
directors of New PZN, and the legal representatives, heirs, successors, or
assigns of any Defendant.
7. With respect to the Settlement Classes, this Court finds and
concludes that: (a) the members of the Settlement Classes are so numerous that
joinder of all Settlement Classes members in the class actions are
impracticable; (b) there are questions of law and fact common to the Settlement
Classes which predominate over any individual questions; (c) the claims of the
Representative Plaintiffs are typical of the claims of the Settlement Classes;
(d) the Representative Plaintiffs and their counsel have fairly and adequately
represented and protected the interests of the members of the Settlement
Classes; and (e) a class action is superior to other available methods for the
fair and efficient adjudication of the controversy, considering: (i) the
interests of the members of the Settlement Classes in individually controlling
the prosecution of the separate actions, (ii) the extent and nature of any
litigation concerning the controversy already commenced by members of the
Settlement Classes, (iii) the desirability or undesirability of continuing the
litigation of these claims in this particular forum, and (iv) the difficulties
likely to be encountered in the management of the class actions.
8. Upon the Effective Date, the Representative Plaintiffs and each of
the members of the Settlement Classes shall be deemed to have, and by operation
of this Judgment, shall have, fully, finally, and forever released, relinquished
and discharged all Released Claims (including Unknown Claims) against each and
all of the Released Persons, whether or not such Settlement Class Members
execute and deliver the Proof of Claim and Release. All Settlement Class Members
are hereby forever barred and enjoined from prosecuting the Released Claims
against the Released Persons.
-3-
5
9. Upon the Effective Date, each of the Defendants shall be deemed to
have, and by operation of this Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever
released, relinquished and discharged each of the Representative Plaintiffs, the
Settlement Class Members, and Representative Plaintiffs' Counsel, from all
claims (including Unknown Claims) arising out of, relating to, or in connection
with the institution, prosecution, assertion or resolution of the Actions or the
Released Claims.
10. Only those Settlement Class Members filing valid and timely Proofs
of Claim and Release shall be entitled to participate in the settlement and
receive distributions from the Settlement Fund. The Proof of Claim and Release
to be executed by the Settlement Class Members shall release all Released Claims
against the Released Persons. All Settlement Class Members shall, as of the
Effective Date, be bound by the releases set forth herein whether or not they
submit a valid and timely Proof of Claim and Release.
11. Neither the Stipulation or the Amended Stipulation, nor the
settlement contained therein, nor any act performed or document executed
pursuant to or in furtherance of the Stipulation or the Amended Stipulation or
the Settlement: (i) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an admission of,
or evidence of, the validity of any Released Claim, or of any wrongdoing or
liability of the Defendants or their Related Persons; (ii) is or may be deemed
to be or may be used as an admission of, or evidence of, any fault or omission
of any of the Defendants or their Related Persons in any civil, criminal or
administrative proceeding in any court, administrative agency or other tribunal;
or (iii) shall be offered in evidence by any Settlement Class Member or
Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel for any purpose except as provided herein.
Defendants have denied and continue to deny each and all of the claims alleged
in the Actions. Released Persons may file the Stipulation,
-4-
6
the Amended Stipulation and/or Judgment from the Actions in any other action
that may be brought against them in order to support a defense or counterclaim
based on principles of res judicata, collateral estoppel, release, good faith
settlement, judgment bar or reduction or any theory of claim preclusion or issue
preclusion or similar defense or counterclaim. The Settling Parties, their
respective counsel or any other Member of the Settlement Class may file the
Stipulation or the Amended Stipulation in any proceeding brought to enforce any
of its terms or provisions.
12. The Court finds that during the course of the Actions, the Settling
Parties and their respective counsel at all times complied with the requirements
of Federal Rule Civil Procedure 11.
13. Any Plan of Allocation submitted by Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel
or any order entered regarding the attorneys' fee application shall in no way
disturb or affect this Final Judgment and shall be considered separate from this
Final Judgment.
14. Exclusive jurisdiction is hereby retained over the parties and the
Settlement Class Members for all matters relating to the Actions, including the
administration, interpretation, effectuation or enforcement of the Stipulation
of Settlement, the Amended Stipulation of Settlement and this Judgment, and
including any application for fees and expenses incurred in connection with
administering and distributing the settlement proceeds to the members of the
Settlement Classes.
15. In the event that the settlement does not become effective in
accordance with the terms of the Stipulation and/or the Amended Stipulation then
this Judgment shall be rendered null and void to the extent provided by and in
accordance with the Stipulation and the Amended Stipulation and shall be vacated
and, in such event, all orders entered and releases delivered in connection
herewith shall be null and void to the extent provided by and in accordance with
the Stipulation and the Amended Stipulation.
-5-
7
16. Without further Order of the Court, the parties may agree to
reasonable extensions of time to carry out any of the provisions of the
Stipulation of Settlement and/or the Amended Stipulation of Settlement.
DATED: 2/9/01
/s/ Todd Campbell
--------------------------------------------
THE HONORABLE TODD CAMPBELL UNITED STATES
DISTRICT JUDGE
Submitted by:
BARRETT, JOHNSTON & PARSLEY
GEORGE E. BARRETT, #2672
DOUGLAS S. JOHNSTON, JR., #5782
/s/ George E. Barrett
- ------------------------------------
GEORGE E. BARRETT
217 Second Avenue, North
Nashville, TN 37201
Telephone: 615/244-2202
Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs
-6-
1
EXHIBIT 99.2
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY FOR THE STATE OF TENNESSEE
TWENTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, DAVIDSON COUNTY
DASBURG, S.A., On Behalf )
Of Itself And All Others )
Similarly Situated, )
)
Plaintiff, ) Civil Action No. 98-239-III
)
vs. ) CLASS ACTION
------------
)
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION )
OF AMERICA, DOCTOR R. CRANTS,)
THOMAS W. BEASLEY, CHARLES )
A. BLANCHETTE, and DAVID L. )
MYERS, ) Chancellor Lyle
)
Defendants. )
_____________________________)
FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
On this 8th day of February, 2001, a hearing having been held before
this Court pursuant to the Orders of this Court, dated October 13, 2000 and
January 10, 2001, on the application of the parties for approval of the
settlement set forth in the Stipulation of Settlement, dated as of October 12,
2000 (the "Stipulation") and the Amended Stipulation of Settlement, dated as of
January 10, 2001 (the "Amended Stipulation"). Due and adequate notice having
been given to the Settlement Class as required in said Orders and the Court
having considered all papers filed and proceedings had herein and otherwise
being fully informed in the premises and good cause appearing therefore,
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT:
2
1. This Judgment incorporates by reference the definitions in the
Stipulation and the Amended Stipulation and all terms used therein shall have
the same meanings set forth in the Stipulation and the Amended Stipulation.
2. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the Action,
the Plaintiff, and other Members of the Settlement Classes, and the Defendants.
3. The Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action and
the Supplemental Notice of Pendency of Class Action, Proposed Settlement
Thereof, Settlement Hearing and Right to Share in Settlement Fund given to the
Settlement Class was the best notice practicable under the circumstances,
including the individual notice to all members of the Settlement Class who could
be identified through reasonable effort, to all persons within the definition of
the Settlement Class and fully met the requirements of Rule 23 of the Tennessee
Rules of Civil Procedure, due process, the United States Constitution, and any
other applicable law.
4. The settlement of the Action, as set forth in the Stipulation and
the Amended Stipulation, is approved as fair, reasonable to the Settlement Class
and to each of the Settling Parties, and the Stipulation and Settlement are
hereby finally approved in all respects, and the Settling Parties are directed
to perform its terms.
5. Except as to any individual claim of those persons (identified in
Exhibit 1 annexed hereto) who have validly and timely requested exclusion from
the Settlement Class, the Action and all claims contained therein, as well as
all of the Released Claims (including Unknown Claims), are dismissed with
prejudice as to the Representative Plaintiff and the other Members of the
Settlement Class, and as against the Released Persons. The Parties are to bear
their own costs, except as otherwise provided in the Stipulation and the Amended
Stipulation.
-2-
3
6. Pursuant to Rule 23 of the Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure, this
Court has certified a Settlement Class consisting of all Persons who purchased
the common stock of Corrections Corporation of America between April 24, 1997
and April 20, 1998. Excluded from the Settlement Class are Defendants and any
entity that nominated a Defendant to serve on the Board of Directors of
Corrections Corporation of America or its predecessors, members of the immediate
family of any Defendant, any entity in which an excluded person has or had a
controlling interest, present or former directors of Corrections Corporation of
America, and the legal representatives, heirs, successors, or assigns of any
Defendant.
7. With respect to the Settlement Class, this Court finds and concludes
that: (a) the members of the Settlement Class are so numerous that joinder of
all Settlement Class members in the class action is impracticable; (b) there are
questions of law and fact common to the Settlement Class which predominate over
any individual questions; (c) the claims of the Representative Plaintiff are
typical of the claims of the Settlement Class; (d) the Representative Plaintiff
and its counsel have fairly and adequately represented and protected the
interests of the Members of the Settlement Class; and (e) a class action is
superior to other available methods for the fair and efficient adjudication of
the controversy, considering: (i) the interests of the Members of the Settlement
Class in individually controlling the prosecution of the separate actions, (ii)
the extent and nature of any litigation concerning the controversy already
commenced by Members of the Settlement Class, (iii) the desirability or
undesirability of continuing the litigation of these claims in this particular
forum, and (iv) the difficulties likely to be encountered in the management of
the class action.
8. Upon the Effective Date, the Representative Plaintiff and each of
the Members of the Settlement Class shall be deemed to have, and by operation of
this Judgment, shall have, fully,
-3-
4
finally, and forever released, relinquished and discharged all Released Claims
(including Unknown Claims) against each and all of the Released Persons, whether
or not such Settlement Class Members execute and deliver the Proof of Claim and
Release. All Settlement Class Members are hereby forever barred and enjoined
from prosecuting the Released Claims against the Released Persons.
9. Upon the Effective Date, each of the Defendants shall be deemed to
have, and by operation of this Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever
released, relinquished and discharged the Representative Plaintiff, the
Settlement Class Members, and Representative Plaintiffs' Counsel, from all
claims (including Unknown Claims) arising out of, relating to, or in connection
with the institution, prosecution, assertion or resolution of the Action or the
Released Claims.
10. Only those Settlement Class Members filing valid and timely Proofs
of Claim and Release shall be entitled to participate in the settlement and
receive distributions from the Settlement Fund. The Proof of Claim and Release
to be executed by the Settlement Class Members shall release all Released Claims
against the Released Persons. All Settlement Class Members shall, as of the
Effective Date, be bound by the releases set forth herein whether or not they
submit a valid and timely Proof of Claim and Release.
11. Neither the Stipulation or the Amended Stipulation, nor the
settlement contained therein, nor any act performed or document executed
pursuant to or in furtherance of the Stipulation or the Amended Stipulation or
the Settlement: (i) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an admission of,
or evidence of, the validity of any Released Claim, or of any wrongdoing or
liability of the Defendants or their Related Persons; (ii) is or may be deemed
to be or may be used as an admission of, or evidence of, any fault or omission
of any of the Defendants or their Related Persons
-4-
5
in any civil, criminal or administrative proceeding in any court, administrative
agency or other tribunal; or (iii) shall be offered in evidence by any
Settlement Class Member or Representative Plaintiff's Counsel for any purpose
except as provided herein. Defendants have denied and continue to deny each and
all of the claims alleged in the Action. Released Persons may file the
Stipulation, the Amended Stipulation and/or Judgment from the Action in any
other action that may be brought against them in order to support a defense or
counterclaim based on principles of res judicata, collateral estoppel, release,
good faith settlement, judgment bar or reduction or any theory of claim
preclusion or issue preclusion or similar defense or counterclaim. The Settling
Parties, their respective counsel or any other Member of the Settlement Class
may file the Stipulation or the Amended Stipulation in any proceeding brought to
enforce any of its terms on provisions.
12. The Court finds that during the course of the Actions, the
Settlement Parties and their respective counsel at all times complied with the
requirements of Tenn. R. Civ. P. 11.
13. Any Plan of Allocation submitted by Plaintiff's Settlement Counsel
or any order entered regarding the attorneys' fee application shall in no way
disturb or affect this Final Judgment and shall be considered separate from this
Final Judgment.
14. Exclusive jurisdiction is hereby retained over the Parties and the
Settlement Class Members for all matters relating to the Actions, including the
administration, interpretation, effectuation or enforcement of the Stipulation
of Settlement, the Amended Stipulation of Settlement and this Judgment, and
including any application for fees and expenses incurred in connection with
administering and distributing the settlement proceeds to the Members of the
Settlement Class.
15. In the event that the settlement does not become effective in
accordance with the terms of the Stipulation and/or the Amended Stipulation then
this Judgment shall be rendered null
-5-
6
and void to the extent provided by and in accordance with the Stipulation and
the Amended Stipulation and shall be vacated and, in such event, all orders
entered and releases delivered in connection herewith shall be null and void to
the extent provided by and in accordance with the Stipulation and the Amended
Stipulation.
16. Without further Order of the Court, the Parties may agree to
reasonable extensions of time to carry out any of the provisions of the
Stipulation of Settlement and/or the Amended Stipulation of Settlement.
/s/ Ellen Hobbs Lyle
--------------------------------------------
THE HONORABLE ELLEN HOBBS LYLE CHANCELLOR
-6-
1
EXHIBIT 99.3
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY FOR THE STATE OF TENNESSEE
TWENTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, DAVIDSON COUNTY
- ------------------------------------
:
WILLIAM WANSTRATH, :
Derivatively on Behalf of :
Nominal Defendant PRISON :
REALTY TRUST, INC., :
:
Plaintiff, :
:
v. : No. 99-1719-III
:
DOCTOR R. CRANTS, D. ROBERT :
CRANTS III, JOHN EAKIN JR., :
TED FELDMAN, JACKSON W. :
MOORE, JEAN-PIERRE CUNY, :
RUSTY M. MOORE, RICHARD W. :
CARDIN, J. MICHAEL QUINLAN :
JOSEPH V. RUSSELL, MICHAEL :
W. DEVLIN, C. RAY BELL., :
CHARLES W. THOMAS, MONROE :
J. CARELL, NED MCWHERTER, :
and CORRECTIONAL MANAGEMENT :
SERVICES CORPORATION, :
:
Defendants, :
:
-and- :
:
PRISON REALTY TRUST, INC., a : Final Judgment And Order
Maryland corporation, : Of Dismissal
:
Nominal Defendant. :
- ------------------------------------ :
:
In re BERNSTEIN v. PRISON REALTY : No. 99-3794-III Consolidated w/00-137III
TRUST, INC., et al. : (transferred to Part III)
- ------------------------------------ :
2
FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL
THIS CAUSE having come before the Court on February 8, 2001, upon
Motion for a Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal pursuant to Tenn. R. Civ.P.
23, and with respect to certain matters relating to the proposed settlement of
the above-captioned actions (the "Actions") in accordance with the Stipulation
of Settlement dated as of October 5, 2000 and the Amendment thereto dated as of
January 6, 2001 and the exhibits thereto (collectively, the "Stipulation"), and
The Court having read and considered the Stipulation, heard arguments
of counsel, granting preliminary approval of the settlement by Order dated
January 9, 2001, and the Court having considered objections raised by members of
the Settlement Class at the Final Settlement Hearing, if any, and being
otherwise fully appraised in the premises, and
All parties having consented to the entry of this Order; it is ORDERED,
ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT:
Definitions
1. For purposes of this Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal ("Final
Judgment"), the Court adopts and incorporates the definitions contained in the
Stipulation.
Jurisdiction
2. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the
above-captioned litigation, and all actions within this litigation or related to
this litigation, and over all parties to this litigation, including all members
of the Settlement Class and CXW Stockholders.
No Admission or Evidence of Liability
3. This Court hereby decrees that neither the Stipulation, nor this
Final Judgment, nor the fact of the settlement, is an admission or evidence of
any violation of any statute or law or of any
-2-
3
liability or wrongdoing by the Defendants or Released Persons or of the truth of
any of the claims or allegations alleged in the Actions. This Final Judgment is
not a finding of the validity or invalidity of any claims in the Actions or of
any wrongdoing or lack thereof by any defendant. The Stipulation, and any and
all negotiations, documents and discussions associated with it, shall not be
deemed or construed to be an admission or evidence of any violation of any
statute or law or of any liability or wrongdoing by the Defendants or Released
Persons, or of the truth of any of the claims or allegations, or of any alleged
defense, or of the absence of any wrongdoing or limitation of damage or injury,
and evidence thereof shall not be discoverable or used directly or indirectly,
in any way, by any Person, in any other proceeding.
Finalization of Preliminary Findings
4. The Court makes final and unconditional the conditional and
preliminary findings made by the Court regarding notice, the maintenance of In
re Bernstein v. Prison Realty Trust, Inc., et al., No. 99-3794-II (the
"Bernstein Action") as a class action, the maintenance of Wanstrath v. Crants,
et al., No. 99-1719-III (the "Wanstrath Action") as a proper derivative action,
and the settlement terms in the Order Regarding Preliminary Approval and Notice
("Preliminary Order") dated January 9, 2001.
Notice to the Settlement Class and CXW Stockholders
5. The Court finds that the Notice of Settlement of the Actions was
given in accordance with the Preliminary Orders filed with the Stipulation and
the Amendment and that such notice was reasonable and constituted the most
practicable notice under the circumstances, constituted valid, due and
sufficient notice to all CXW Stockholders and Settlement Class Members, and
complied
-3-
4
fully with the requirements of due process, the Tennessee Constitution, the
Constitution of the United States, and any other applicable law.
6. The Court, solely for the purposes of the proposed Settlement, finds
the prerequisites to a class action have been satisfied in the Bernstein Action.
Specifically, the Court finds that all of the prerequisites to a class action
are satisfied, pursuant to Tenn. R. Civ.P.23.01, in that (i) members of the
Settlement Class are so numerous that joinder of all members thereof is
impracticable; (ii) there are questions of law and fact common to the Settlement
Class; (iii) the claims of the class representatives are typical of the claims
of the Settlement Class; and (iv) the class representative will fairly and
adequately represent the interests of the Settlement Class. In addition, the
Court finds that the requirements of Tenn. R. Civ. P. 23.02(2) are met, in that
Defendants have acted on grounds generally applicable to the Settlement Class.
7. The Court finds, for settlement purposes only, that the certified
class of plaintiffs (the "Settlement Class") is hereby defined to consist of:
All persons who were record owners or beneficial owners of Prison Realty Trust,
Inc. ("PZN") common stock at any point in time between and including December
27, 1999 and April 17, 2000. Excluded from the Settlement Class are Defendants,
members of the immediate family of the Defendants, any entity in which any
Defendant has or had a controlling interest, directors and officers of PZN, and
the legal representatives, heirs, successors, or assigns of any such excluded
Person or entity.
8. Pursuant to Tenn. R. Civ.P.23.06 and for the purposes of the
Settlement only, the Court further finds that the Wanstrath Action was properly
brought as a derivative action for and on behalf of PZN (and later, maintained
on behalf of CXW), and that William Wanstrath fairly and
-4-
5
adequately represents the interests of the shareholders similarly situated in
enforcing the rights of CXW in the Wanstrath Action.
9. The Court determines, solely for purposes of settlement, that Hilda
R. Bernstein, Bill Hardee and George A. Holle, Jr. are adequate representatives
of the Settlement Class in the Bernstein Action and that William Wanstrath is an
adequate representative of CXW in the Wanstrath Action.
Approval of the Settlement
10. This Court hereby approves the settlement set forth in the
Stipulation and finds, in accordance with Tenn. R. Civ. P.23, that said
settlement is, in all respects, fair, reasonable, adequate and in the best
interests of the Company, CXW Stockholders and the Settlement Class and all of
its members and directs the consummation and implementation of the settlement in
accordance with the terms and provisions of the Stipulation.
11. This Court further finds that the settlement has been entered into
and made in good faith, and that the Representative Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs'
Settlement Counsel have fairly and adequately represented the interests of the
Settlement Class, the Company and CXW Stockholders in connection with this
litigation and the settlement.
Dismissal with Prejudice
12. The Court hereby dismisses with prejudice In re Bernstein v. Prison
Realty Trust, Inc., et al., No. 99-3794-II and Wanstrath v. Crants, et al., No.
99-1719-III filed herein without costs to any party, except as provided herein.
-5-
6
Releases and Covenants
13. For purposes of this Judgment, the "Released Persons" means each
and all of the Defendants and their respective Related Parties.
14. Representative Plaintiffs, PZN, CXW Stockholders and the members of
the Settlement Class, forever release and discharge the Released Persons from
all manner of claims (including Unknown Claims as that term is defined in the
Stipulation) demands, rights, liabilities and causes of action of every nature
and description whatsoever, known or unknown, whether or not concealed or
hidden, asserted or that might have been asserted by the Settlement Class, PZN
Stockholders on behalf of PZN, or CXW Stockholders on behalf of CXW, or any of
them, against the Defendants in the Actions, that are based upon or related in
any way to the facts, circumstances, transaction, events, occurrences,
disclosures, statements, omission, acts or failures to act which were alleged or
could have been alleged in the Actions, including, without limitation, claims
for negligence, gross negligence, breach of duty of care and/or breach of duty
of loyalty, fraud, constructive fraud, self-dealing, misrepresentation (whether
intentional, negligent or innocent), suppression (whether intentional, negligent
or innocent), omission (whether intentional, negligent or innocent),
mismanagement, gross mismanagement, abuse of control, unjust enrichment, breach
of contract, breach of fiduciary duty or violations of any state or federal
statutes, rules or regulations or any other source of legal or equitable
obligation of any kind or description in whatever forum including, but not
limited to any claims relating to the Blackstone Proposal, the restructuring
proposal by the Pacific Life Insurance Company, and the Restructuring.
-6-
7
15. Representative Plaintiffs, CXW, CXW Stockholders and members of
the Settlement Class, are hereby permanently barred and enjoined from asserting,
instituting, maintaining, prosecuting or enforcing against any of the Released
Persons any of the Released Claims (including "Unknown Claims") in any court or
other forum whatsoever, including such Released Claims as already may have been
asserted in any pending action, arbitration or other proceeding.
Continuing Jurisdiction
16. Without affecting the finality of this Judgment in any way, this
Court retains continuing jurisdiction: (a) over the implementation,
administration and consummation of this settlement; (b) over these Actions until
the Final Judgment contemplated hereby has become effective and each and every
act agreed to be performed by the parties to the Stipulation shall have been
performed pursuant to the Stipulation; and (c) over all parties to these Actions
and all parties to the Stipulation for the purpose of taking such other actions
as may be necessary to conclude and administer this settlement and to implement
and enforce the Stipulation.
Termination of Settlement
17. In the event that the settlement does not become effective or is
terminated in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Stipulation, then
this Final Judgment shall be rendered null and void and be vacated and the
Stipulation and all orders entered in connection therewith by this Court shall
be rendered null and void.
Attorney's Fees and Expenses
18. Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel are hereby awarded as attorneys'
fees and reimbursement of expenses the sum of $2,735,000 in cash and 2,639,500
shares of CXW common stock (the "Fee and Expense Award"). The Fee and Expense
Award has been determined by the
-7-
8
Court to be fair, reasonable, and entirely appropriate. No other fees, costs or
expenses may be awarded to Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel in connection with the
Actions or any related action. The Fee and Expense Award shall be paid in cash
and CXW common stock, immediately after the Court executes this Final Judgment
and Order of Dismissal, provided that a repayment bond or other security
acceptable to the parties has been obtained to secure repayment of the amount to
be paid if the Fee and Expense Award is reversed or modified on appeal or the
settlement does not become effective or is terminated.
19. Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel are authorized and directed to
allocate and distribute the Fee and Expense Award among Plaintiffs' Settlement
Counsel in a manner which in Plaintiffs' Settlement Counsel's good faith
determination, reflects each counsel's contribution to the institution,
prosecution, and settlement of the Actions.
20. The costs and expenses associated with the consummation and/or
administration of the settlement shall be paid pursuant to the terms of the
Stipulation.
Entry of Final Judgment
21. The Court finds that no just reason exists for delay in entering
final judgment in accordance with the Stipulation. Accordingly, the Clerk is
hereby directed to enter this Final Judgment forthwith.
/s/ Ellen Hobbs Lyle
--------------------------------------------
Chancellor Ellen Hobbs Lyle
-8-
1
EXHIBIT 99.4
Contact: Karin Demler, 615/263-3005
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA RECEIVES FINAL COURT APPROVAL OF
TERMS OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTS IN STOCKHOLDER LITIGATION
NASHVILLE, Tennessee - (February 13, 2001) - Corrections Corporation of
America, formerly Prison Realty Trust, Inc. (NYSE: CXW), announced today that it
has received final court approvals of the revised terms of the definitive
agreements with respect to the settlement of a series of class action and
derivative lawsuits brought against CCA by current and former stockholders of
CCA and its predecessors. The final terms of the settlement provide for the
"global" settlement of all outstanding stockholder litigation against CCA and
certain of its existing and former directors and executive officers.
Pursuant to the revised terms of the settlements, CCA will issue to the
plaintiffs:
- an aggregate of 46,900,000 shares of CCA's common stock; and
- a subordinated promissory note in the aggregate principal
amount of $29.0 million.
Other than with respect to the issuance of the common stock and the
promissory note by CCA, the original settlement agreements have not been altered
by the terms of the revised settlement agreements, including the requirement
that CCA pay approximately $47.5 million in cash insurance proceeds to the
plaintiffs.
The promissory note will be due January 2, 2009, and will accrue
interest at a rate of 8.0% per annum. All principal and interest due under the
note will be payable in one lump sum at maturity; provided, however, that should
the average trading price of CCA's common stock meet or exceed a "termination
price" equal to $1.63 per share for 15 consecutive trading days at any time
prior to the maturity date of the note, all amounts outstanding under the
promissory note will be deemed fully satisfied without further action by CCA. To
the extent the highest average trading price of the common stock does not reach
the designated "termination price" during the period, the amount to be paid
under the note will be reduced by the amount the shares of stock issued to the
plaintiffs appreciate in value pursuant to a calculation to be made at the time
of the maturity of the note.
CCA previously announced on January 19, 2001 that it had obtained
preliminary court approval of the terms of the definitive settlement agreements.
The terms of the definitive settlement agreements described above with respect
to the issuance of the common stock and the promissory note replace all
previously existing obligations of CCA, under the provisions of the original
settlement agreements and a Memorandum of Understanding between the parties, to
issue shares of its common stock and/or other indebtedness to the plaintiffs in
the litigation.
2
A more complete description of the terms of the final settlement will
be included as an exhibit to a Current Report on Form 8-K to be filed by CCA
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") via EDGAR.
Further details on the final settlement can also be found in the Supplemental
Notice of Pendency of Class Actions, Proposed Settlement Thereof, Settlement
Hearing and Right to Share in Settlement Fund, which is available from the
Settlement Administrator.
Also, as part of the revised settlement, the deadline for claimants who
have not already done so to submit a Proof of Claim and Release Form to the
Settlement Administrator has been extended to March 12, 2001.
ABOUT THE COMPANY
CCA is the nation's largest provider of detention and corrections
services to governmental agencies. CCA is the industry leader in private sector
corrections with approximately 61,000 beds in 68 facilities under contract for
management in the United States and Puerto Rico. CCA's full range of services
includes design, construction, ownership, renovation and management of new or
existing jails and prisons, as well as long distance inmate transportation
services.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This press release contains statements that are forward-looking
statements as defined within the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties
that could cause actual results to differ materially from the statements made.
Factors that could cause operating and financial results to differ are described
in CCA's Form 10-K, as well as in other documents filed with the Commission, and
these factors include, but are not limited to, the growth of the private
corrections and detention industry, CCA's ability to obtain and maintain
facility management contracts and general market conditions. CCA does not
undertake any obligation to publicly release the result of any revisions to
forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or circumstances
after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.